As far as making judgments go, that part is not as much in your control as you think it is.
That depends on the amount of time you spent meditating and being aware of how your mind. I won’t say I never make judgements because that’s not true but I do think I have relatively good awareness.
I know how easy trust that one can use to affect the other person at a deep level can develop when you are in a state of mind of nonjudgement.
It might take years of hard work to get to that place but if you do the benefits that you get for your social interactions are bigger than the little benefits that you get through telling white lies.
The difference between the two is that you simply have a lot more time in an academic situation in which you can analyse and decide exactly what you want to put across, something which is quite impractical in day to day communication.
I think there pretty good evidence that most people who let themselves be funded by the drug industry taint the papers that they write to be more in the interest of the drug industry and most of them don’t think they are engaging in practice that sends them to “Academic Hell”,
As you said above, making mental judgements is a speedy process. Few people have good self awareness that would be required to be unbaised.
If the little lies that you tell in your research paper result in your result not replicating does it really matter whether you fulfill the technical definition for fraud?
It takes practice at being honest to avoid lying in a way where you lie to yourself about it just as much as you are lying to the audience that reads your paper.
That depends on the amount of time you spent meditating and being aware of how your mind. I won’t say I never make judgements because that’s not true but I do think I have relatively good awareness.
I know how easy trust that one can use to affect the other person at a deep level can develop when you are in a state of mind of nonjudgement.
It might take years of hard work to get to that place but if you do the benefits that you get for your social interactions are bigger than the little benefits that you get through telling white lies.
I think there pretty good evidence that most people who let themselves be funded by the drug industry taint the papers that they write to be more in the interest of the drug industry and most of them don’t think they are engaging in practice that sends them to “Academic Hell”,
As you said above, making mental judgements is a speedy process. Few people have good self awareness that would be required to be unbaised. If the little lies that you tell in your research paper result in your result not replicating does it really matter whether you fulfill the technical definition for fraud? It takes practice at being honest to avoid lying in a way where you lie to yourself about it just as much as you are lying to the audience that reads your paper.