Unless they have telepathy or brain scanning technology, people would ostracize, burn, or marry you based on your actions, not your beliefs. After Kim Jong Il’s death, people had to display grief, but they didn’t have to feel grief.
Barring telepathy, brain-scanning tech, or an inability to lie well, I expect that actually believing the zeitgeist of a totalitarian society is of lower utility than just pretending to believe it.
The problem there is that humans are good lie detectors and bad liars. They are built that way: lie detecting is important because our ancestors may have had to deal with the best liars—while they could often get by without being good liars more easily. So: the safest way to make people think that you believe something is often to actually believe it.
Unless they have telepathy or brain scanning technology, people would ostracize, burn, or marry you based on your actions, not your beliefs. After Kim Jong Il’s death, people had to display grief, but they didn’t have to feel grief.
Barring telepathy, brain-scanning tech, or an inability to lie well, I expect that actually believing the zeitgeist of a totalitarian society is of lower utility than just pretending to believe it.
The problem there is that humans are good lie detectors and bad liars. They are built that way: lie detecting is important because our ancestors may have had to deal with the best liars—while they could often get by without being good liars more easily. So: the safest way to make people think that you believe something is often to actually believe it.