Dan H

AISN #56: Google Re­leases Veo 3

AISN #55: Trump Ad­minis­tra­tion Re­scinds AI Diffu­sion Rule, Allows Chip Sales to Gulf States

• Dan H 15 May 2025 21:36 UTC

  27 points

  4

  on: Eliezer and I wrote a book: If Any­one Builds It, Every­one Dies

  It’s a great book: it’s simple, memorable, and unusually convincing.

AISN #54: OpenAI Up­dates Restruc­ture Plan

AISN #53: An Open Let­ter At­tempts to Block OpenAI Restructuring

AISN#52: An Ex­pert Virol­ogy Benchmark

AISN #51: AI Frontiers

• Dan H 4 Apr 2025 20:18 UTC

  3 points

  4

  in reply to: Tao Lin’s comment on: Good Re­search Takes are Not Suffi­cient for Good Strate­gic Takes

  If a strategy is likely to be outdated quickly it’s not robust and not a good strategy. Strategies should be able to withstand lots of variation.

AISN #50: AI Ac­tion Plan Responses

AISN #49: Su­per­in­tel­li­gence Strategy

In­tro­duc­ing MASK: A Bench­mark for Mea­sur­ing Hon­esty in AI Systems

On the Ra­tion­al­ity of Deter­ring ASI

AISN #48: Utility Eng­ineer­ing and EnigmaEval

• Dan H 13 Feb 2025 0:18 UTC

  16 points

  3

  in reply to: Zach Stein-Perlman’s comment on: Zach Stein-Per­l­man’s Shortform

  capability thresholds be vague or extremely high

  xAI’s thresholds are entirely concrete and not extremely high.

  evaluation be unspecified or low-quality

  They are specified and as high-quality as you can get. (If there are better datasets let me know.)

  I’m not saying it’s perfect, but I wouldn’t but them all in the same bucket. Meta’s is very different from DeepMind’s or xAI’s.

• Dan H 10 Feb 2025 21:28 UTC

  14 points

  12

  in reply to: Drake Thomas’s comment on: Drake Thomas’s Shortform

  though I don’t think xAI took an official position one way or the other

  I assumed most of everybody assumed xAI supported it since Elon did. I didn’t bother pushing for an additional xAI endorsement given that Elon endorsed it.

AISN #47: Rea­son­ing Models

AISN #46: The Transition

• Dan H 19 Jan 2025 1:37 UTC

  32 points

  0

  in reply to: meemi’s comment on: meemi’s Shortform

  It’s probably worth them mentioning for completeness that Nat Friedman funded an earlier version of the dataset too. (I was advising at that time and provided the main recommendation that it needs to be research-level because they were focusing on Olympiad level.)

  Also can confirm they aren’t giving access to the mathematicians’ questions to AI companies other than OpenAI like xAI.

AISN #45: Cen­ter for AI Safety 2024 Year in Review

• Dan H 3 Dec 2024 4:45 UTC

  10 points

  2

  on: (The) Light­cone is noth­ing with­out its peo­ple: LW + Lighthaven’s big fundraiser

  and have clearly been read a non-trivial amount by Elon Musk

  Nit: He heard this idea in conversation with an employee AFAICT.